<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publish SOMETHING!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purplestripe.com/2010/publish-something/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purplestripe.com/2010/publish-something</link>
	<description>Social Technology Strategists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynette</title>
		<link>http://www.purplestripe.com/2010/publish-something/comment-page-1#comment-112586</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplestripe.com/?p=798#comment-112586</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve dipped in and out of that world, I understand your view.  Pharma and finance are two areas in particular that have compliance issues and understandably for legal reasons need to keep a lid on a lot of &#039;surfing&#039; and unauthorized communications.  Just as every single employee isn&#039;t authorized to sign legal documents in the name of the company, not every employee should be allowed to represent (in any way, shape, or form) or speak on behalf of their employer.

I agree if employees are actually abusing the system, they need to be cut off.  Not every employee needs Facebook or LinkedIn to perform their job functions during the day.  Mostly, proper EDUCATION and TRAINING are lacking.  I&#039;m not suggesting putting up a PowerPoint &#039;training session&#039; on the company&#039;s SharePoint site - it never works.  Assuming employees understand the risks of watching YouTube during company time jut because they clicked through a mandatory presentation doesn&#039;t work.  On an individual level, a good number of employees could CARE LESS about how their actions affect the infrastructure or other people&#039;s productivity.  I know this from experience, I&#039;ve been at some of the Big Pharma and seen the (lack of) results from passive education.  On the flip side, younger generations view unlimited access to the web as a *right* and as vital to their happiness and productivity as eating and breathing.  Corporate culture, and how it&#039;s managed, also go a far way into curbing slacker behaviors.  When employees are unhappy or feel under-valued or under-appreciated (regardless of the bad economy or not) they have a strong sense of entitlement to &#039;take&#039; from their employer - bandwidth and all.

My issue is - what about employees that have a real reason to reach out and interact with customers?  Marketing departments need to publish content on a good number of these channels.  Sales needs to know what consumers are asking for.  I know it&#039;s nearly impossible to block all unnecessary sites (MLB.com, for example, unless they happen to be a client...) but by prohibiting all access outside of email (we are seeing quite a few clients now that have this policy in place) it makes everyone&#039;s jobs harder.  What&#039;s the best mix?  It&#039;s up to each company, but there will come a point where access needs to be granted to function in today&#039;s social economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve dipped in and out of that world, I understand your view.  Pharma and finance are two areas in particular that have compliance issues and understandably for legal reasons need to keep a lid on a lot of &#8216;surfing&#8217; and unauthorized communications.  Just as every single employee isn&#8217;t authorized to sign legal documents in the name of the company, not every employee should be allowed to represent (in any way, shape, or form) or speak on behalf of their employer.</p>
<p>I agree if employees are actually abusing the system, they need to be cut off.  Not every employee needs Facebook or LinkedIn to perform their job functions during the day.  Mostly, proper EDUCATION and TRAINING are lacking.  I&#8217;m not suggesting putting up a PowerPoint &#8216;training session&#8217; on the company&#8217;s SharePoint site &#8211; it never works.  Assuming employees understand the risks of watching YouTube during company time jut because they clicked through a mandatory presentation doesn&#8217;t work.  On an individual level, a good number of employees could CARE LESS about how their actions affect the infrastructure or other people&#8217;s productivity.  I know this from experience, I&#8217;ve been at some of the Big Pharma and seen the (lack of) results from passive education.  On the flip side, younger generations view unlimited access to the web as a *right* and as vital to their happiness and productivity as eating and breathing.  Corporate culture, and how it&#8217;s managed, also go a far way into curbing slacker behaviors.  When employees are unhappy or feel under-valued or under-appreciated (regardless of the bad economy or not) they have a strong sense of entitlement to &#8216;take&#8217; from their employer &#8211; bandwidth and all.</p>
<p>My issue is &#8211; what about employees that have a real reason to reach out and interact with customers?  Marketing departments need to publish content on a good number of these channels.  Sales needs to know what consumers are asking for.  I know it&#8217;s nearly impossible to block all unnecessary sites (MLB.com, for example, unless they happen to be a client&#8230;) but by prohibiting all access outside of email (we are seeing quite a few clients now that have this policy in place) it makes everyone&#8217;s jobs harder.  What&#8217;s the best mix?  It&#8217;s up to each company, but there will come a point where access needs to be granted to function in today&#8217;s social economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khürt Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.purplestripe.com/2010/publish-something/comment-page-1#comment-112585</link>
		<dc:creator>Khürt Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplestripe.com/?p=798#comment-112585</guid>
		<description>Right now, my employer is dealing with bandwidth issues because thousands of employees are on YouTube.com and/or watching MLB.com games.  The network is 100% saturated and 60% of that traffic is YouTube, Hulu etc.  We have a Security Awareness program and despite messages about the use of unauthorized software employees still download things they shouldn&#039;t be.  The Help Desk is swamped with call from employees who are having trouble with approved applications after installing browser toolbars and mouse icons.  All this &quot;non-business&quot; work costs companies (and shareholders) million of dollars.

Employees are joining social networks such as facebook and LinkedIn and discussing company business - forgetting that the world is watching.  Imagine an employee on LinkedIn making a claim about a company product/service that was never vetted by the sales and marketing team?

So yes.

&quot;Information technology departments treat employees like teens that cannot be trusted with the Internet&quot; because people do treat the company network like their personal home network.

NOTE: I am an Information Security Analyst for a large pharma in the Princeton area.
.-= Khürt Williams´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/khurt/~3/J0GVPUb_9qg/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Using Mail, Address Book and iCal with Exchange 2007 and Active Directory&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now, my employer is dealing with bandwidth issues because thousands of employees are on YouTube.com and/or watching MLB.com games.  The network is 100% saturated and 60% of that traffic is YouTube, Hulu etc.  We have a Security Awareness program and despite messages about the use of unauthorized software employees still download things they shouldn&#8217;t be.  The Help Desk is swamped with call from employees who are having trouble with approved applications after installing browser toolbars and mouse icons.  All this &#8220;non-business&#8221; work costs companies (and shareholders) million of dollars.</p>
<p>Employees are joining social networks such as facebook and LinkedIn and discussing company business &#8211; forgetting that the world is watching.  Imagine an employee on LinkedIn making a claim about a company product/service that was never vetted by the sales and marketing team?</p>
<p>So yes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Information technology departments treat employees like teens that cannot be trusted with the Internet&#8221; because people do treat the company network like their personal home network.</p>
<p>NOTE: I am an Information Security Analyst for a large pharma in the Princeton area.<br />
.-= Khürt Williams´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/khurt/~3/J0GVPUb_9qg/" rel="nofollow">Using Mail, Address Book and iCal with Exchange 2007 and Active Directory</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secrets to Success on Social Media — Purple Stripe Productions</title>
		<link>http://www.purplestripe.com/2010/publish-something/comment-page-1#comment-112583</link>
		<dc:creator>Secrets to Success on Social Media — Purple Stripe Productions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplestripe.com/?p=798#comment-112583</guid>
		<description>[...] Publish SOMETHING! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Publish SOMETHING! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Publish SOMETHING! -- New Article in "Secrets to Success on Social Media" series -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.purplestripe.com/2010/publish-something/comment-page-1#comment-112582</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Publish SOMETHING! -- New Article in "Secrets to Success on Social Media" series -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplestripe.com/?p=798#comment-112582</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Lynette Young and SMCPrinceton NJ, Purple Stripe. Purple Stripe said: Publish SOMETHING! http://bit.ly/bwXVST -- New Article in &quot;Secrets to Success on Social Media&quot; series [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Lynette Young and SMCPrinceton NJ, Purple Stripe. Purple Stripe said: Publish SOMETHING! <a href="http://bit.ly/bwXVST" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bwXVST</a> &#8212; New Article in &quot;Secrets to Success on Social Media&quot; series [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

